Custom license plates provide drivers with a special chance to express their individuality. These people have the option to put personalized phrases or letter and number combinations to their license plates for an extra charge. Vanity plates provide people a chance to express themselves creatively and in a distinctive way. Vanity plate applications are sometimes denied, nevertheless, because state governments and their bureaus of motor vehicles object to controversial wording.
Wendy Auger found out lately that a term on her vanity plate—which she had proudly exhibited for fifteen years—had unexpectedly caused it to be denied. Many people smiled when she drove along the highways and back roads of her New Hampshire home because of her humorous vanity plate, which said “PB4WEGO.” Auger, a bartender from Rochester, New Hampshire’s Gonic neighborhood, was shocked to learn that the DMV found the circumstance to be disrespectful.
Auger is convinced that her fundamental right to free speech is being curtailed by the state. Furthermore, in her opinion, it is acceptable to include the term “pe* before we go” on a vanity plate. She interprets it as a common bit of wisdom that parents impart to their kids.
Auger had not bought the plate by accident. She had been looking for it for years and was excited that it was finally going to be available. She immediately decided to put “PB4WEGO” on her New Hampshire license plate, seizing the chance. The state’s decision to raise the character limit on its vanity license plates from six to seven was the driving force behind this modification.
The state stated that the rules are now quite explicit and that they were changed years ago as a result of a court order from the New Hampshire Supreme Court.
Is Auger supposed to get a new license plate as it is fifteen years old?
I Snatched My Tip Back Because of the Waiter’s Nasty Attitude
Amelia (30F) shared a recent dining experience that highlights the complexities of tipping and customer service. She and her husband (30M) went to a restaurant to celebrate his promotion, and everything went well until the end.
When the check arrived, Amelia left a $10 tip on an $85 bill. The waitress picked up the money and sneered, “Ten bucks? This isn’t the 1950s anymore, you know.” Amelia was stunned by her condescending tone. “I think 10 bucks on an $85 bill is more than fair,” she responded.The waitress rolled her eyes and retorted, “It’s a standard 20% tip these days, cheapskate. Do you not know how to calculate that?” Amelia, now angry, replied, “With that kind of nasty attitude, you don’t deserve a tip at all!” She then took back the $10 bill.The situation escalated as the waitress began loudly berating Amelia, causing a scene. The manager had to remove the waitress, and Amelia and her husband left without leaving a tip. Amelia admits she might have overreacted but feels the waitress’s behavior was unacceptable.Amelia shared her thoughts, “That $10 was over 11%, which is a decent tip by any measure. Her entitlement really rubbed me the wrong way.” The waitress’s public confrontation left the couple embarrassed and upset, overshadowing their celebratory evening.This incident raises important questions about tipping etiquette and handling conflict in service situations. Should Amelia have maintained her composure, or was her reaction justified given the waitress’s attitude? The debate continues as others weigh in on how to navigate such situations without escalating the conflict.
Leave a Reply