Moms are known for embarrassing their kids. But if you’re Dakota Johnson and your mom is famous actress Melanie Griffith, the embarrassment level goes up when she introduces you to the President of the United States.
While talking about some of her past movie roles, like The Social Network from 2010, Dakota shared with Vanity Fair how she felt a bit embarrassed during her first meeting with Barack Obama, all because of her mom.
“One time, I was with my mom, and we were meeting Barack Obama, which was a big deal,” Dakota recalled. “He was talking to her, and she said, ‘Oh, Mr. President, this is my daughter. She just did a movie. She’s an actress too. She was in The Social Network.’”
But instead of stopping there, her mom added an embarrassing detail, telling the former president, “She’s in her underwear.” In the movie, Dakota plays a college student who has a fling with Justin Timberlake’s character, Sean Parker, and in one scene, she wears an off-the-shoulder Stanford sweatshirt and bright red underwear.
About the experience, Dakota joked, “And I died. I died inside.”
In the same video, she talked about her thoughts before working with Justin Timberlake on The Social Network. “Are you kidding? I was just 19 and straddling Justin Timberlake and whipping him in the face with my hair,” Dakota said when asked if she had any ideas about acting with the former boy band member. “I definitely had some preconceived notions, but he was really nice and welcoming, especially since I was just a stranger.”
New Discovery on Missing Malaysian Flight 370 Will Shock You—What Researchers Just Uncovered
Recent research has uncovered new information that could change what we know about the disappearance of Malaysian Flight 370. The plane, which vanished in 2014 with 239 people on board, has been a mystery for years. Now, these new findings suggest we may have missed important clues.
The research looks at previously unknown data from the plane’s last communications and satellite tracking. This analysis has found strange patterns that challenge old theories about the plane’s final moments. One of the most surprising discoveries is evidence that the plane’s systems might have been remotely controlled, raising concerns about aviation security and the possibility of outside interference.
One of the most troubling parts of the new research is the discovery of strange patterns in the plane’s satellite communications. Data logs show unusual activity that wasn’t seen before. This suggests that the plane’s path may have been changed on purpose, leading to questions about why this happened and who might have had the ability to do it.
The research also points to odd details in the plane’s final communications with air traffic control. These irregularities suggest the plane could have been controlled by someone else, an idea that wasn’t explored in earlier investigations. This new evidence shifts the focus from a mechanical problem or pilot mistake to the possibility of external control or sabotage.
These new discoveries have serious implications. They challenge what we thought we knew about the flight’s disappearance and suggest new areas for investigation. If the plane was remotely controlled or tampered with, it raises big concerns about weaknesses in aviation technology and the risk of similar events happening in the future.
For the families of the passengers and the public, these revelations bring mixed emotions. There is hope that these findings could finally provide answers and closure, but also fear about what this means for the safety of air travel worldwide.
As researchers keep studying the new data, both the aviation community and the world are waiting for more information. These findings could change our understanding of what happened and lead to important updates in aviation safety rules.
This new development in the Malaysian Flight 370 investigation highlights how complicated and unclear modern air travel can be. It shows the need for ongoing attention and openness to solve the mysteries surrounding one of aviation’s biggest puzzles.
Leave a Reply