“Look Like Mother and Son,” Daniel Radcliffe, 34, Makes Rare Appearance With Partner, 39 — Fans Are Shocked

When Daniel Radcliffe and Erin Darke arrived at the Tony Awards, their entrance electrified the event. The audience buzzed, captivated not only by their striking appearance, but also by the cascade of responses their presence provoked.

The Harry Potter star and his partner of 12 years, Erin Darke, made a super rare red-carpet appearance together this weekend. The duo, who have been together since 2012 and celebrated the birth of their first child in April of the previous year, appeared deeply enamored with each other as they attended the 77th Annual Tony Awards.

The 34-year-old actor wrapped an arm around his 39-year-old girlfriend’s waist as they laughed and tenderly looked into each other’s eyes while posing for photos. He looked sharp in a lilac suit paired with a bowtie, while Erin caught everyone’s attention in a shimmering gray ball gown embellished with sequins and rhinestones, complete with a tulle skirt.

People online praised the beautiful couple and showered them with compliments. One person wrote, ’’They look great and so happy,’’ and another added, ’’They both look so happy and comfortable with each other.’’

However, many were taken aback by the height difference between the couple. One observer shared, “Look like mother and son. The difference in height is also embarrassing, he needs to find someone shorter than him.” Someone else noted, ’’They don’t look suited, but love is love.’’

We admire the radiant confidence and beauty of this lovely couple. Another celebrity duo making recent headlines was Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis, who appeared with their son and daughter. Online viewers were astonished to see the two beautiful children, who are rarely seen in public.

Why Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds Weren’t at 2024 Met Gala

The 2024 Met Gala is a wrap, but let’s be real, it was missing some major players this time around. Like, where was Blake Lively, the ultimate Met Gala royalty? She and Ryan Reynolds ghosted the event for the second year straight, and fans are totally bummed about it.

Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds ended up skipping their second Met Gala in a row. Instead of hitting the town for the “Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion” themed bash, Blake and Ryan opted for a cozy night in with their four kiddos. Family time over fancy parties—it’s hard to argue with that!

Lively sparked hope she could attend the Met Gala when she went to a Tiffany & Co. event in New York last week. Ultimately, she let that be her big fashion moment for early May.

Blake Lively has quite the Met Gala history, even poking fun at herself for perfectly coordinating with the carpet in previous years. Her last Met Gala appearance was in 2022, where she not only attended, but also co-chaired the event. Embracing the “Gilded Glamour” theme, she stunned in an Atelier Versace gown paired with her signature Lorraine Schwartz jewelry and a tiara.

What sets Lively apart is that she styles herself, even for major events like the Met Gala. She explained that she enjoys the creativity and control it offers.

Fans were eagerly anticipating Blake Lively’s return to the 2024 Met Gala, hoping for her signature style and charisma to grace the event once again. However, when she didn’t make an appearance, disappointment swept through social media. “Blake Lively, where are you?” one fan questioned, echoing the sentiments of many who were eagerly awaiting her presence.

Another fan expressed their disappointment, saying, “pretending to not care Blake Lively isn’t there to save the night #MetGala.” It’s clear that Lively’s absence left a noticeable void for many attendees and followers of the event, underscoring her significant impact and presence at the Met Gala over the years.

Check out Blake’s top Met Gala looks of all time!

Preview photo credit Invision/Invision/East News, Invision/Invision/East News, vancityreynolds / Instagram

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*