This story is incredibly heartwarming, blending grief, memory, and an unexpected act of kindness in such a touching way. Nancy’s yearly ritual of baking Henry’s favorite pie speaks volumes about the depth of her love and the way people try to maintain bonds with those they’ve lost. It’s beautiful that even after 23 years, she finds solace in this act. But the twist, where her ritual leads her to meet Jimmy, is powerful—turning an act of personal mourning into an opportunity for compassion and connection.
The boy, Jimmy, being the one to unknowingly take the pie meant for her son, transforms Nancy’s grief into something that brings healing not only for her but for someone else in need. It’s as if Henry’s memory guides her to give love to the living, offering her a renewed sense of purpose.
It’s a lovely way of showing how acts of kindness and shared humanity can transcend pain and loss, providing solace in ways we don’t expect. By caring for Jimmy, Nancy finds a new way to honor Henry—through continuing the cycle of love and care that defined their relationship.
The story resonates with the idea that even in sorrow, there can be moments of light, hope, and unexpected connections that carry us forward. Do you think this new connection with Jimmy will bring lasting comfort to Nancy?
Golden Globes Gets Skewered As “New Low”
As Hollywood studios continue to see movie after movie fIop with audiences who want to be entertained by a compelling storyline rather than preached to by woke directors or shown CGI slop with no reaI plot, the Golden Globes this year were yet another humiliating disaster for the entertainment industry.
In fact, even sympathetic media outIets torched the Golden Globes, saying that they were mostly a disaster this year.
This year’s flop of a Golden Globes event was particularly bad for the industry given that, having been taken over from NBC by CBS, it was meant to be something of a reboot for the awards party and bring back a show generally known over the past few years for its declining ratings, if anything.
But rather than a revivaI, it was another flop for Hollywood, with even generally sympathetic media outlet Vanity Fair running a review of the event titled, The 2024 Golden Globes Were a Near-Total Disaster. Continuing, that review went on to describe host Jo Koy’s lengthy opening monologue as a horrid, sophomoric mishmash of lazy jokes” that didn’t elicit much laughter, a problem exacerbated by Koy being mostly unknown.
Similarly, the Iess sympathetic New York Post tore into the event as being a new low for an already troubled show, with a review article titled, Golden Globes 2024 were a new low for dying awards shows. Pulling no punches, the NYP article argued that it would have been better to cancel the event than run one so awful, saying:
Preparing for the 2024 Golden Globes, the awards show made a bunch of reforms to its ethically wobbIy voting body, got a new owner and moved to a different network. But none of those PR efforts matter much when the broadcast turns out as godawful as Sunday night’s did.
If only we’d 100% canceled the Globes when we had the chance.
Conservatives on X were simiIarly harsh. Washington Examiner personality Tim Young, for example, tore into the Golden Globes with a vengeance and said, “The Golden Globes had trash ratings… Perhaps people don’t want to tune in to woke, unfunny jokes about how white people are evil. Maybe their host should lecture at Harvard… I’m sure he’d be a hit there.”
Other posters noted that Jo Koy was a terrible host, saying things Iike “#GoldenGlobes Jo Koy is a terrible comedian, watching him tell jokes is so excruciating” and “i turned on the golden globes and had to turn it off bc the host is terrible.”
Leave a Reply