Years of public scrutiny surround a Hollywood family’s rift involving a once-celebrated father and his children. After a painful estrangement, whispers of reconciliation have emerged. Can the wounds of the past truly heal?
The father, a musician and actor, enjoyed fame in the ’70s but faced personal turmoil as tensions rose with his children amid the glitz. What began as a passionate romance with their mother in 1975 quickly soured, leading to their divorce in 1981. While initially devoted to his children, his absence grew, exacerbated by their mother’s rising fame and new relationship.
By 2015, the situation exploded when the eldest child posted a scathing Father’s Day message on Instagram: “Happy Abandonment Day.” The father reacted with heartbreak, claiming betrayal and mourning the loss of his children. He blamed their mother for fostering a narrative that painted him as an absent parent, accusing her of “parental alienation” and insisting he tried to maintain a relationship.
As the siblings found success in Hollywood, the estrangement became public. The daughter honored her mother’s partner on Father’s Day, deepening their father’s feelings of rejection. He declared that he no longer recognized them as his children, claiming he had “set them free.”
Despite the pain, Bill Hudson often reflected on the love he once had for his children, cherishing memories of their early years together. He expressed sadness over their separation, particularly following the Father’s Day posts that struck him deeply.
Kate and Oliver Hudson have voiced their complex feelings about their father. Kate has noted that while the estrangement is difficult, she harbors no resentment and has expressed a desire for his happiness. Oliver initially reacted with sarcasm but has since indicated an openness to reconnecting.
In May 2024, Bill confirmed that steps toward reconciliation were underway, stating, “We are warming up.” The family appears to be mending their fractured relationship through small gestures of understanding, signaling hope for a fresh start after years of hurt.
Drew Barrymore and her grandfather’s friend Vincent Price together in 1984…Check c,o,m,m,e,n,t,s below
Even though there are dozens of different experts that work on the appearances of characters in movies, they aren’t immune to making mistakes. And in the end, viewers may catch these fails in makeup or costume choices that couldn’t have possibly existed during the time in which the movie was set.
We at Bright Side decided to watch some of our favorite movies and read some fashion history books to find the mistakes makeup artists and costume designers have made in popular films.
Gone with the Wind
No matter how trendy Scarlett O’Hara was, she couldn’t have predicted the clothing trends for decades in advance. Her famous slim-fitting red dress with feathers and rhinestones has nothing to do with Civil War fashion — it was inspired more by styles from the 1930s and 1940s.
Julius Caesar
In the 1953 film, most of the female characters wore extravagant bullet bras. In Ancient Rome, women would wear a strophium, a prototype for the modern bra, but these weren’t bullet bras.
Legends of the Fall
Trying to create a romantic look, costume designers ignored the historical facts. Brad Pitt’s character has beautiful blonde hair and facial hair but these things were unacceptable for the time period. More and more men were choosing to don big mustaches and short hair at this time.
King Arthur
The film, which is set in the fifth century, portrays knights in heavy metal armor. But until the fourteenth century, such armor was made of leather, and only mail armor was made of metal.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
The film is about events that happened in the ’90s and the clothes look pretty accurate, however, they’re still not perfect. Dudley Dursley is wearing G-Unit shorts — a brand that was created by 50 Cent in 2003.
Hello, Dolly!
The movie is set in New York at the end of the nineteenth century when such a hairstyle, lip gloss, and eye makeup didn’t exist. But the movie still got 3 Oscars and became one of the most important films of the decade.
Queen Margot
Throughout the entire film, the characters are wearing beautiful dresses with open shoulders. They look great but in the sixteenth century, women never ignored shifts (or chemise in French). These pieces of clothing protected them from the cold, absorbed sweat, and were really easy to wash.
Another mistake costume designers made was the way the main character’s hair was let down. Based on the few portraits we have of Margaret of Valois, she had curly hair that she wore up.
The Danish Girl
The Danish Girl starts in 1926 but in the first half of the film, we see women in slim-fitting clothes that have nothing to do with the fashion of the 1920s.
At the beginning of the film, Gerda has a hairstyle that was actually quite outdated for the setting that favored waved or bobbed hair.
A Dangerous Method
In one scene, Keira Knightley appears only in her corset, which is a contradiction to the original rules that came along with wearing this piece of clothing. A woman would never wear a corset alone.
Bonus: Mary Queen of Scots
In Mary Queen of Scots, Saoirse Ronan is wearing asymmetric earrings, which were non-existent in sixteenth-century Scotland.
In your opinion, do you think such mistakes are serious or no big deal?
Preview photo credit A Dangerous Method / Recorded Picture Company
Leave a Reply